As governments push for a sustainable energy future, the question remains: Is nuclear power worth the risk?
The words are everywhere: 'climate catastrophe,' 'climate crisis,' and 'climate emergency.' These phrases dominate headlines, political speeches, and social media feeds. Why has the rhetoric around climate change shifted from science-based caution to alarmist declarations?
The mainstream media, government officials, and corporate giants have worked in harmony to paint renewable energy as the unassailable hero in the fight against climate change. A polished narrative is repeatedly reinforced: solar panels and wind turbines are the answer to the so-called 'climate emergency.' But is this the truth—or a convenient political narrative?
Net zero. The term has become a mantra for governments, corporations, and activists alike. But dig deeper, and the cracks in the narrative start to show.